Dispute resolution and choice of forum

Law 14,879/2024, enacted in June 2024, amended Article 63 of the Code of Civil Procedure, imposing new rules for the forum selection clause in business and civil contracts. Now, this clause must respect the place of domicile of one of the parties or the place where the obligation provided for in the contract will be fulfilled. Consumer relations continue to have the legal protection that the choice of forum must favor the consumer.

This change is relevant because it limits the freedom of the parties to choose the forum. Furthermore, the clauses that deal with dispute resolution and the choice of forum have a major impact on the legal certainty of contracts.

When signing a contract, the parties can decide whether any disputes will be resolved in court or through arbitration, and may also provide for prior mediation. This choice should take into account factors such as the desired confidentiality and the amount involved. While arbitration guarantees confidentiality as a rule, in judicial proceedings this depends on a specific decision by the judge, with exceptions provided for in the legislation.

Another important point is the choice of the arbitration or mediation chamber, if this route is adopted. The costs of this procedure vary according to the value of the dispute and the number of arbitrators involved (one or three). Therefore, in contracts of lower value or involving individuals, the cost may become a factor that discourages arbitration.

To avoid future problems, the arbitration clause must be clear and objective, indicating the chosen chamber, the location of the proceedings and the language used. It is also recommended that the parties provide for a judicial forum for urgent situations. The careful inclusion of these clauses, with adequate analysis of which mechanism best applies to the contract (judicial or arbitration), reduces the risk of preliminary disputes over the jurisdiction of the court, which can delay the resolution of the conflict and increase the costs involved.

Our Civil Litigation and Arbitration team is available for any clarifications or questions.

more publications

Estatuto

The Chamber of Deputies approved, on April 22, 2026, Bill No. 6,461/2019, which establishes the Apprentice Statute. The text now goes to the Senate for consideration and proposes a new regulatory framework for professional apprenticeship in Brazil, especially...

vgbl

Impacts of VGBL taxation for beneficiaries: The Brazilian Federal Revenue Service has come to understand that amounts received by beneficiaries of VGBL plans, due to the death of the policyholder, may be subject to Income Tax, depending on their origin...

NR-16

The update to NR-16 (Regulatory Standard No. 16) reached a new milestone with the publication of Ordinance No. 2,021, of December 3, 2025, by the Ministry of Labor and Employment. The standard approved Annex V, which deals with the activities...

Devedor Contumaz

The concept of a habitual debtor has gained new dimensions in Brazilian legislation with the publication of Complementary Law No. 225, of January 8, 2026, which establishes the Taxpayer Defense Code, regulated by Joint Ordinance RFB/PGFN No. 6/2026....

Inteligência Artificial

Artificial intelligence in Brazil is advancing on the regulatory agenda with the recent approval of Bill No. 2,688/2025 by the Communications Committee (CCom) of the Chamber of Deputies, which establishes the Regulatory Framework for artificial intelligence. The text will still be analyzed...

Licença-paternidade

The enactment of the new law that extends paternity leave from 5 to up to 20 days and creates paternity pay, carried out last Tuesday (31), brings relevant impacts for companies and requires immediate attention to changes in labor legislation. Despite...