End of the 6x1 work schedule: how to adapt your company to the new rules.

The enactment of the Constitutional Amendment resulting from PEC No. 221/2019, which reduces the maximum working hours from 44 to 40 hours per week and eliminates the 6x1 shift schedule by extending paid weekly rest, consolidates a historical milestone in labor relations and reignites the debate on the balance between employee appreciation and the economic sustainability of companies.

With the conclusion of the legislative process in the National Congress, the immediate effects are already becoming apparent for various sectors of the economy, especially those characterized by high intensity of on-site labor, continuous operating regimes, and strong dependence on operational planning.

The change affects all existing employment contracts and will have a significant impact on human resources routines, collective bargaining, production cost formation, productivity management, and the pricing of products and services.

What changes in practice for labor relations?

The amendment to Article 7 of the Federal Constitution establishes, among its main guidelines:

  • Maximum workday of 8 hours and 40 hours per week, achieved in a phased manner;
  • Guarantee of two paid weekly rest days, one of which should preferably be on Sundays;
  • Gradual transition rule: reduction to 42 hours per week two months after the amendment is published (already including the two days of rest) and reaching the final limit of 40 hours after another 12 months;
  • Express maintenance of salaries and minimum wages, with any reduction in pay due to a decrease in working hours being prohibited;
  • The possibility exists for collective agreements and conventions to establish compensatory work schedules, including for workers subject to differentiated schedules, provided that, on average per month, two paid rest days are guaranteed;
  • Provision for sub-constitutional regulations to govern specific cases and sectors of differentiated work schedules.

In practice, the proposal reduces the number of available working hours without reducing employee pay, increasing the cost per hour worked and requiring the expansion of staff or the restructuring of shifts to maintain usual productivity levels.

It is worth noting that the guarantee of two days of rest does not necessarily imply fixed days off on Saturdays and Sundays. Especially in sectors that operate continuously or seven days a week, the enjoyment of rest may be organized through alternating schedules and rotation systems, respecting the Sunday preference and the monthly periodicity stipulated in the regulation.

In this context, the reorganization of work schedules will cease to be merely a matter of human resources management and will become an integral part of companies' strategic planning. This scenario reinforces the use of collective bargaining as an indispensable instrument for adapting to the new constitutional limits.

Among other aspects, the collective agreement and convention may regulate:

  • New work schedule matrices and shift systems;
  • Time bank and working hours compensation mechanisms;
  • Shift reorganization;
  • Criteria and limits for working overtime;
  • Working weekends and holidays on continuous assignments;
  • Operational rules for adaptation during the transition period.

The approval of the Constitutional Amendment Proposal (PEC) represents a profound transformation in labor relations in the country, transferring to the strategic management of companies the challenge of reconciling the reduction of the weekly work schedule with the financial sustainability and productivity of the business. In this new scenario, the strategic use of collective labor agreements, the restructuring of work schedules, and preventive legal governance become indispensable to navigate the transition period with legal certainty.

Our office remains available to answer questions and assist in analyzing the impacts of this important decision.

more publications

273

Complementary Law No. 236, published on September 4, 2026, introduced significant changes to the National Tax Code (CTN), especially regarding penalties arising from non-compliance with principal and accessory tax obligations. Among the new provisions, the establishment of... stands out.

269

The TST (Superior Labor Court), in its ruling on Case 215, decided that workers may, exceptionally, file a labor lawsuit in their place of residence, even if the defendant company does not have national size or operations. The decision establishes the precedent that...

265

The FGTS (Brazilian Severance Indemnity Fund) Board of Trustees approved the distribution of part of the Fund's positive result for 2025. R$ 13 billion, equivalent to 89% of the period's profit, will be transferred directly to workers' linked accounts. Who is entitled:...

266

The Regional Labor Court of the 2nd Region (São Paulo) overturned a decision that had held a former partner liable for the payment of approximately R$30,000 in unpaid wages owed by a bankrupt company. The change occurred after Justice Gilmar Mendes of the Supreme Federal Court (STF)...

271

Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Gilmar Mendes has ordered the suspension of the execution of a labor lawsuit concerning alleged fraud in the hiring of a worker through a legal entity, even after the judgment has become final. The decision was...

278

In a decision issued on June 17, 2026, Minister Gilmar Mendes ordered the partial lifting of the national suspension of proceedings related to General Repercussion Theme 1,389, which discusses the legality of contracting with legal entities and workers...